🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where election day went kind of poorly for him, where the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.