Professional Network Engagement Boost: Women Discover Better Results By Pretending to be Male Users
Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?
Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.
The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility
Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.
Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.
Systemic Preference Concerns Raised
The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.
Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.
Platform Response
Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.
Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.
Individual Results
Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.
"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.
Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.
The Method
- Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
- Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
- Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language
The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.
The Negative Aspect
Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.
"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."
She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."
Mixed Results
Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.
"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.
Broader Implications
These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.
Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.
Technical Explanation
Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.
The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.
Evolving Environment
According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.
"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."